Quantcast
Channel: Exchange Previous Versions - Mail Flow and Secure Messaging forum
Viewing all 944 articles
Browse latest View live

Problems relaying mail with CDO e2007

$
0
0

Hello,

a customer is trying to deploy an application on the server itself that needs to send mail via Microsoft/CDO, they're using one of the domain users as their login but when they try to send it they get:

550 5.7.1 client does not have permissions to send as this sender

is this a sendas problem?, where can i set this sendas permission for an origin email that does not exists for example?(not a mailbox, not a user mailbox, not a ME user either)


vse engine of Lotus notes 8.5

$
0
0

Hi..

While opening Lotus notes 8.5 on Windows 7, getting error: Unable to initialise the vse engine.

I have searched and found the solution related to notes.ini file. But, it is not working. Please suggest something.

Thanks 

Encryption emails leaving local Exchange 2003 are blank

$
0
0

I inherited a network with Exchange 2003 where the client is trying to get email encryption going with the outside.  They have email certs and the certs work for digitally signing emails, whether they send to internal or external recipients, and for digitally encrypting emails when they send to internal recipients only.

However, when we send an encrypted email to an external address, the body is blank, the email does not appear to be encrypted, and it shows that there is an attachment (smime.p7m) which, I believe, is the encrypted content.  These same recipients work with encrypted emails all of the time, so it is not them.

Any help you can provide would be enormously appreciated - I am new to Exchange administration and it doesn't seem like the previous tech was too good at it, either.

Thank you!

SSL Qutis functioning for IMAP & POP3 after windows server upgrade

$
0
0

My tech quit and I am winging it and need some guidance.

I am running a 2008 R2 server with Exchange 2010. I am a bit behind on updates so I ran a windows server update on July 24 2014. Up to that time my IMAP and POP3 SSL connections were working correctly.  Now I get this error from MS test connectivity site.

The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer is attempting to obtain the SSL certificate from remote server mail.mydomain.com on port 995. The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer wasn't able to obtain the remote SSL certificate.

The certificate couldn't be validated because SSL negotiation wasn't successful. This could have occurred as a result of a network error or because of a problem with the certificate installation.

TheOWA and everything else still works but IMAP and POP3 need SSL turned off to work. I have spent days reading and trying to figure this out.  I have not been able to find what changed but have learned a lot. 

Any idea as to what update broke the system? Do I need to somehow reinstall the SSL cert?

If I go to Exchange Management Console and look at the server configuration for Exchange Certificates I have 2 of them listed. One self signed true with service of SMTP and one is false with IIS & SMTP. Under the status tab it says ‘The certificate is valid for Exchange Server Usage’.

If I add IMAP and POP to one or both will it solve my problem? Or will I be creating more problems?

The MMC gives me one more cert to look at, but when you look at it you see the following:

This CA Root Certificate is not trusted. To enable trust install this certificate in the Trusted Root Certification Authorities store.

The CA Root certificate is not trusted because it is not in the Trusted Root Certification Authorities store.

Receive Connector message: Tarpit for '0.00:00:09.675' due to 'DelayedAck',Delivered

$
0
0

We are currenly running an Exchange 2010 system in coexistence with an Exchange 2003 system.  It's fairly small so we're using the default routing group connector between the two systems that was created when the first 2010 Hub server was installed.  Most users' mailboxes are on Exchange 2003 with a few test users on Exchange 2010.  All our Internet-bound emails are sent through a single send connector to smart hosts provided by Mimecast (hosted SMTP service).  So far, so good.

After a couple of days of co-existence we noticed that emails sent from Exchange 2003 users to users in Exchange 2010 were taking a long time (> 20 mins) to get to the Exchange 2010 mailboxes.  I went straight to the SMTP queue on the legacy Exchange 2003 bridgehead to the Exchange 2010 routing group and saw that there was a backlog of about 200 messages, the oldest being about 30 mins.  A few of the messages were in a "Retry" state, which I thought should not be possible between Exchange servers of the same organization on the same physical network.

The receive connector logs on the Exchange 2010 machine were indicating slow email acceptance and were generating log file entries like this one for each message:

  Tarpit for '0.00:00:09.675' due to 'DelayedAck',Delivered

I came across some interesting blog entries regarding this which described the Delayed SMTP Acknowledgement and the Exchange 2010 queue shadow redundancy.  These links are copied out below.

The short of it was that the Exchange 2010 server was not acknowledging emails sent from Exchange 2003 in a normal way.  It was holding the SMTP session open until the 2010 Transport Service had acknowledgement that the message had been received before allowing the SMTP server on Exch 2003 to continue with the next message.  To fix this I just ran the command:

  Set-ReceiveConnector "Default connector (Servername)" -MaxAcknowledgementDelay 0

This turns this feature off and lo and behold the queue on the Exchange 2003 server quickly disappeared.  Email flow is back to normal and is as quick as you would expect.

The moral to the story is that if you are co-existing with Exchange 2003 server then leave this feature off if you can.  Given that the maximum queue length in our small organization rarely exceeds 5 messages it's not exposing us to unacceptable risk and it can be reverted to 30 seconds once Exchange 2003 is decomissioned.

I hope this helps someone.

Articles that helped me:

http://theangryangel.co.uk/blog/slow-relaying-with-microsoft-exchange-2010 

http://mikecrowley.wordpress.com/2010/07/24/delayed-smtp-acknowledgement

552 Message size exceeds maximum message size

$
0
0
[Dell Inspiron 560 desktop;MS Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64bit; Windows Live Mail 2011; MS Word Pro 2003; Mozilla Firefox 22.0; Adobe FP 11,8,800,94; Adobe Reader 11.......]

Hello, I have the same problem, 10 emails I sent out bounced with the following same error message:

">>>xxxxxxxxxatxxxxxxxx.co.il(reading confirmation): 552 Message size exceeds maximum message size"

And they also sent the headers....which is all Greek to me.  Being a very beginner computer user, I can't execute the good advice given here.

This is very strange since the emails so bounced only had 5 small pictures I had taken in my small, cheap dig camera, while other messages I had sent outsuccessfully before were probably 4 times as big.

Also, whose fault is it: my server RCN?  Microsoft?  I wonder...

I hope there's something easier for me to do to fix this problem? 

Thanks ever so much for any help!  :)      Adela

Two Email addresses joined together

$
0
0

I saw interesting issue today.. where External user(From Internet from Lotus notes) sent an email to one groupmailbox and few recipients. When i tracked in Boundary system(Ironport) it delivered correctly and when i tracked in Exchange 2010 it shows correctly, even the Deliver event shows separate address as A.eroomsupport@test.com and abhishek_agarwal@a.com. But when it reaches Mailbox of user it shown as"A.eRoomSupport@test.com>, abhishek_agarwal"@a.com)where A.eroomsupport@test.com is a group mailbox and abhishek_agarwal@a.com is a separate address.

This is not only for one user but same in for all the recipients. When recipients "reply all" we are getting bounced NDR.

Our environment has :

Exchange 2010 SP3 RU3, Cisco Ironport and mail was sent from Lotus notes. outlook 2013, 2010 and webapp as well.

Any help is appreciated!!!


Regards, Bhoopat.

11004 error SBS Exchange 2003 SP2 with POP connector. Exchange version 6.5 7638.1

$
0
0

Hello

I am getting loads of errors displayed in Event Viewer Application log like:-

Event ID 1035

 A error occurred in connecting to the <xxx.xxxxxx.co.uk> POP3 server for user <xxx@XXXXXXXXXXXX.co.uk>. The error is 11004. The server may be down for maintenance or your server is not connected to the Internet.


Event ID 1023

The downloading process for mailbox <xxx@XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.co.uk [mail.XXXXXXXXXXXXX.co.uk]> was ended with one or more errors.

The Server has 3GB memory and 64GB free disk space on the parttiion supporting Exchange

Can anyone suggest a troubleshooting scheme?


Mail Receive from outside in Exchange server 2010 (Accepted Domain)

$
0
0

Hello All

Two Exchange 2010 server running existing environment. in front of two exchange server have McAfee firewall. This McAfee Firewall receive the mail from outside and send it to Exchange 2010 server.

for example abc.com is working well to send and receive mail using exchange server. recently i have addAccepted Domain which is bcd.com.   But this Accepted Domain can not receive mail from outside. I have configure MX record, Accepted Domain and also mail point. but the problem is that mail cannot receive from outside domain. i have also several time modify the receive connector but abc.com work but bcd.com not work

Please suggest.


Error:

firewall.abc.com rejected your message to the following email addresses:
firewall.abc.com gave this error:
<samulc@bcd.com>... Relaying denied

Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. The address may only accept email from certain senders or another restriction may be preventing delivery. For more tips to resolve this issue seeDSN code 5.7.1 in Exchange Online. If the problem continues contact your help desk.


Stuck Queues to Mail Enabled Public Folders

$
0
0

We are on exchange 2003 SP2 with 4 Back End servers (BE) and 2 Front End servers (FE). The Public Folders are on BE1. Mail from the outside to Mail Enabled Public Folders is stuck in the Local Delivery Queue on FE1. On BE1 there is a stuck queue for FE1. Also “Additional queue information” states “Destination server does not exist. “  All the messages stuck in the FE1 queue have the following properties:

Sender:  BE1-IS@domain.org

Subject:  Folder Content

Recipients: SMTP:FE1-IS@domain.org

Mail flow to user mailboxes is working on both front end servers and mail flow to the public folders is working on FE2.

Does anyone have any suggestions as to how to correct this?

Exchange messages formatting changes since adding automatic signature

$
0
0

After adding a signature line to my Hub Transport Rules, all of the emails turn into double spacing once they go out to the recipient.

I know that this is HTML coding and a full break is added in each time the user hits the enter key as opposed the old break (<br>).

Is there any way to change this or, is this something that I am stuck with?

Here is an example of what the email looks like when it is composed:

Dear Bob,
Thank you for you recent inquiry.  We are excited about working with you.
Our goal is satisfaction with all of our vendors.
Please call us if you have any questions.

Bill

----------------------------------------

Here is what it looks like when it gets to the recipient:

Dear Bob,

Thank you for you recent inquiry.  We are excited about working with you.

Our goal is satisfaction with all of our vendors.

Please call us if you have any questions.

Bill

Inbound emails marked as "quarantined" never show up in quarantine mailbox

$
0
0

Exchange Server 2010  Version: 14.03.0123.003

I've been trying to fix spam issues on an Exchange server, and have stopped the worst of the spam flow to the end users, however,   I want to be sure that I can release legitimate emails from the quarantine should the need  arise.

I've been a little aggressive  with the Content Filter properties.  Delete is set at 7,  Reject at 6, and Quarantine is at 5.  (I did this over several days to see what level actually stopped the spam.

For the third day in a row when I examine the log files I see mostly deletions and rejections, but there are many that are supposedly quarantined that don't show in the quarantine mailbox.

I've changed the mailbox quarantine with no success.   Please advise

451 4.4.0 Primary target IP address responded with:"454 4.7.0 Temporary authentication failure"

$
0
0

I have this error on both my hub transport servers. I cannot get the communication between them.

This is also accompanied by the event ID 2017 in the application log. Description
Outbound authentication failed with error TargetUnknown for Send connector Intra-Organization SMTP Send Connector. The authentication mechanism is ExchangeAuth. The target is SMTPSVC/<servername.FQDN>.


I have already the following http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb217800.aspx

It only tells me how to fix a send connector that i created. The connectors mentioned above is the ones that exchange creates when trying to send between sites.

Has anyone else got this problem if so how did you resolve it?

MSExchangeTransport 19008 error

$
0
0

I am getting an error "Reading recipient with routing address lbainter@mydomain.com from the Active Directory failed with data validation error. The detail of the error is Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.Recipient.NonUniqueProxyAddressError" this user referenced no longer exists on the domain and the account and mailbox have been deleted. how do I get rid of this error

Exchange Server 2010 Version: 14.01.0438.000

Email Loop

$
0
0

Hi,

Exchange 2010

Ive started to see an issue where a customers out of office hits one of my mailboxes (which has an autoresponder email)  and then starts to get into a loop.

There are thousands upon thousands of emails coming in from the same external email and the same subject line of "Automatische Antwort: Automatic reply: Automatische Antwort: Automatic reply:"

At the moment Ive created a transport rule to delete these when they come in, but how do I resolve this long term?

Any ideas would be greatful


blocked using FBLW15

$
0
0

我收到的信

  

 uchidayoko-com.mail.eo.outlook.com [213.199.154.23]說:550 5.7.1服務

    不可用; 客戶端主機[125.227.237.181]使用FBLW15堵塞; 要求

    除去從這個名單,請將此郵件轉發給

    (在答复RCPT TO命令)

我們的唐鳴= elecbiz.com.tw

如何 解決

Creating Transport rule : Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.

$
0
0

hi,


I'm trying to create a new transport rule and get the error

Test Auto-reply
Failed

Error:
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.

Exchange Management Shell command attempted:

New-TransportRule -Name 'Test Auto-reply' -Comments 'test' -Priority '0' -Enabled $true -From 'me@host.com' -SentTo 'someoneelse@host1.com' -SubjectContainsWords 'TEST' -SetHeaderName 'Reply-To' -SetHeaderValue 'noreply@host.com'

is this at all possible?

If so what am I doing wrong?

thanks

Transport rule adding disclaimer to user that should not get it

$
0
0
We have a transport rule that adds a disclaimer IF the user is a member of a certain dynamic distribution group. This DDG is reliant on the CustomAttribute2 field for the user account, so if you have a value such as CompanyName in this attribute, you will be on the list.

This rule has been in place for about a year without any apparent issues, but just recently a user that has the attribute field set to a different company value is still getting the disclaimer appended to his outgoing messages. When I preview the membership of the DDG, this user's account does not come up. I do not have any other complaints of this happening to other accounts, this is the only one.

Any suggestions?

Disable POP Connector for one user

$
0
0

Using SBS2003 with Exchange. Use the POP Connector to retrieve mail. We have a user that we do not want to receive mail for--at least temporarily. Is there a way to disable the receipt of mail, by like disabling the POP Connector, on a per user mailbox basis?

If not, is there any other way to do this?

451 4.4.0 DNS query failed to some domains from Hub transport

$
0
0
Exchange 2007 hub running on Windows Server 2008.  IPv6 has been disabled per http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ipv6/ipv6faq.mspx.  Looking at a packet capture, I see the following:

DNS      Standard query AAAA webmail.xxxxxxxxx.com
DNS      Standard query response, Server failure

Both servers are in the same AD domain/site and running Windows Server standard 2008 SP1.

Email will sit in the queue until it expires.  

Nslookup (from Windows XP or hub server) against the same DNS server will resolve the
xxxxxxxxx.com to webmail.xxxxxxxxx.com with a valid IP address. I can telnet using port 25 to that IP address from the Hub server without any problems.

Once the hub server receives the DNS error, it will retry again at the set time interval using IPv6 DNS query.  Of course it fails again and the pattern continues until the email expires.

If I put the mx record in the hosts file, email is delivered immediately.

I have seen http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb878121.aspx where it mentions having the DNS server respond to a second query, but the trace doesn't even show a second attempt.

No smarthost involved in outgoing email.

The destinations worked in Exchange 2003 on Windows Server 2003.  If we redirect the email from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2003, it will be delivered.  Not a good solution since we are removing 2003.

I would expect when the IPv6 query fails it would try IPv4.  This does not seem to be the case with Server 2008.


Viewing all 944 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>